In light of the aggravation of the military conflict in Syria, in which a dozen countries are already participating and each has its own interests, ominous prophecies about the beginning third world war are becoming more and more relevant.
Some of these revelations are quite old, some are modern, but each tells of the coming terrible cataclysms and upheavals caused by human weapons and bloodlust.
“I don’t know what weapons World War III will be fought with, but stones and sticks will be used in the Fourth!”, Albert Einstein wrote in a letter to US President Harry Truman in 1945, and for 73 years these words have been scaring the whole world, but alas do not stop politicians from wars.
World War III will be started by Donald Trump
This was reported back in 2017 by the Portuguese mystic and prophet Horacio Villegas. Villegas said that a nuclear war involving the United States, Russia, North Korea and China could begin on May 13, the day of the 100th anniversary of the appearance of the Virgin Mary in Fatima, Portugal. And "it will last" until October 13th.
Many were sure that the Portuguese was talking about 2017, since last year the United States also bombed Syria furiously. But since there was no nuclear cataclysm in 2017, and this year Syria was bombed together with the United States by two more countries: France and Great Britain, many people now think that maybe it was about 2018?
Horacio Villegas is famous for predicting the victory of Donald Trump in the US presidential election back in 2015, although all the media supported Hillary Clinton and assured her that victory was already in her pocket. Villegas also called Trump "King of the Illuminati".
Disturbing Prophecy of Mother Shipton
lived in a small English village in the early 16th century. Her mother, Agatha Southail, was a fortune teller and it was whispered about her that the Devil himself came into her house. After one of these visits, Agatha had a daughter, Ursula, who was very ugly in appearance, but already had unusual abilities as a child, and from the age of 16 she began to make predictions.
Many of her prophecies have come true. She predicted the great plague of 1665, the invasion of the Spanish Armada (“Wooden horses that come from the West, Drake’s forces will be smashed to pieces”), the attack of the troops Henry VIII to Normandy and much more.
According to her prediction about a terrible war, it will begin in the East and apparently the United States will be the main destructive force.
"Alas, the war will come from where the Turks and pagans live, who will bury themselves in a cruel quarrel. When the north is separated from the south, and the eagle will be with lion's jaws, burden, blood and war will come to every home. The yellow people will receive the great power of the mighty the bear they will help. The tyrants will not be able to divide the world into two parts and these actions will be very dangerous. And the intermittent fever will leave many deaths in its wake."
There are a couple more lines to this prophecy.
"Kingdoms will become jealous and fearful and the trap will turn against them when the dear black worm leaves behind only a few lives."
Prophecies about the Third World from Nostradamus
Nostradamus has at least 12 quatrains that can be interpreted as predictions of World War III.
“The spit will connect with the pond in Sagittarius,
At its highest point.
Plague, famine and death by armed hands,
The century is approaching its renewal.
“After a great misfortune, humanity faces an even greater,
When will it be updated big cycle centuries
It will rain blood and milk, famine, war and disease.
Fire will be seen in the sky, followed by a tail of sparks.
"Mabus will soon die, then the
Terrible extermination of people and animals:
Suddenly retribution will come
A hundred hands, thirst and hunger when the comet passes.
Baba Vanga
Bulgarian Vanga, also known as Baba Vanga (1911-1996), is considered one of the greatest soothsayers of the 20th century. She is credited with many prophecies about the beginning of the Third World War, but in reality she did not express most of them.
For example, Vanga did not say anything about "deserted Europe" and "chemical poisoning." And her famous statement in recent years, “Syria has not yet fallen,” is rather taken out of context and is associated more with crises than with a global war:
“Mankind is destined for many more cataclysms and turbulent events… Coming hard times, people will be divided by their faith... The most ancient teaching will come into the world... They ask me when this will happen, soon? No, not soon. Syria hasn't fallen yet...
But such statements took place in reality: “The apocalypse will come”, “Evil will break out of the ground and destroy everything”, “Only Russia will be saved, not everything”, “In Russia there will be both water and peace”. Perhaps this is due to the upcoming big war.
However, in an interview that Vanga gave to the Russian journalist Sergei Kostorny in 1995, Sergei asked Vanga "Are big wars and natural disasters awaiting humanity in the near future?" And Vanga replied, "There will be separate outbreaks, but it will not affect everyone at once."
Pope's words
In 2014, Pope Francis declared that World War III "has already begun, in part." Prior to this, in recent months, the Pope has repeatedly called for an end to armed conflicts in different parts world: in Ukraine, Iraq, Syria, the Gaza Strip and African countries.
And in 2017, Francis declared that the shortage fresh water could lead to a new global conflict.
"The right to water is decisive for the survival of man and the future of mankind. And I ask myself if we are moving towards a big world war over water," the pontiff said.
According to the UN, water scarcity currently affects more than 40% of people in the world, access to clean water deprived of 783 million inhabitants of the planet. By the middle of the 21st century, the number of people living with a constant lack of water will exceed 4 billion people.
Could a third world war break out in 2018?
If so, here are five risk areas where this could happen, as identified by Aftonbladet.
“There is an increased risk,” says Isak Svensson, professor of peace and conflict studies at Uppsala University.
Republican Senator Bob Corker has warned that Donald Trump could lead the US down "the road to a third world war."
There is a risk that he is not completely mistaken.
According to Isak Svensson, professor of peace and conflict studies, there are three factors that hinder war more than others.
All of them are now collapsing, largely because of Trump and rising nationalism.
1. International organizations
“One of the goals of the UN, the OSCE (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe), the EU and similar organizations is to reduce the risk of armed conflict. But because Trump is constantly trying to dismantle international cooperation, these organizations may weaken. This will affect the risk of war,” says Isak Svensson.
2. International trade
During his campaign, Trump accused China of "raping" the American economy. Therefore, many experts expected that he would impose customs duties on Chinese goods, which would result in a full-fledged trade war.
“That hasn't happened yet, but at least he signaled that he's not particularly interested in encouraging free trade,” Isak Svensson said.
3. Democracy
The two democracies have never been at war with each other. But the wave of nationalism that has swept the world can rock democracies.
“Populist nationalism has targeted democratic institutions: universities, courts, media, electoral bodies, and so on. This is noticeable in the United States under Trump, in Hungary, Poland and Russia, for example, ”says Isak Svensson.
Threat from nationalism
Svensson sees how nationalism threatens all three factors preventing war.
“Nationalism exists not only in peripheral countries, but now it is also spreading among the main players in the international arena: in the US, in the UK in the form of Brexit, in the EU with its Poland and Hungary, which can weaken European cooperation. India and China are very strongly influenced by nationalist ideologies, as well as Turkey and Russia. All this, together with Trump, negatively affects these three factors. There is a considerable risk of interstate conflicts,” says Isak Svensson.
However, he does not believe that a major global war is likely.
“The probability of this is small. By and large, inter-state conflicts are very unusual, and over time they happen less and less. But if this happens, then the events unfold very intensively,” says Isak Svensson.
Here are the hottest hotbeds of tension.
North Korea
States: North Korea, USA, Japan, China.
North Korea conducts nuclear weapons test explosions and constantly develops new missiles. One of the latest missiles tested this summer is capable of hitting the US, but it's not clear if North Korea can equip it with a nuclear warhead.
North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un and US President Donald Trump exchanged hate-filled verbal provocations, including Trump's promise to meet North Korea with "fire and fury."
The US is allied with South Korea and Japan, which also feel threatened by North Korea. And this closed dictatorship in turn receives support from China.
“In the short term, the most problematic area is the Korean Peninsula,” says Niklas Swanström, head of the Institute for Security Policy and Development.
“At the same time, the likelihood that China will protect North Korea is very small. This will only happen if there is a threat to the direct interests of China, that is, if the United States sends troops to the Chinese borders or something like that.”
Isak Svensson agrees that Korea is the most worrying because the situation there is unpredictable.
“It is not very likely, but it is possible that something will happen there. Everyone is in tension, various exercises are being held and a demonstration of strength to each other, there is a big risk that something will go wrong. This can start the process even if no one really wants it. No one is interested in bringing things to a full-scale war, but there is still a risk of this, ”says Isak Svensson.
The biggest problem is poor communication, says Niklas Svanström.
“There are no security structures in Northeast Asia. A military confrontation can escalate very sharply.”
South China Sea
States: USA, China, Taiwan, Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei.
Here is one of the most serious pockets of tension, according to Isak Svensson.
“There is an incredibly large military potential. The likelihood that something will happen is small, but if it does, the consequences will be catastrophic. There are nuclear weapons there, and alliances have been made between different countries, so they can drag each other into all sorts of complications in relations.”
At first glance, the conflict revolves around hundreds of small islands and reefs near China, Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines. Approximately half of the islands are under the control of one of the four countries.
Both China and Taiwan and Vietnam claim the entire Spratly archipelago, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei also have their own claims.
In early 2014, China began clearing seven reefs under its control between the islands and laying bases on them.
The situation is marked by ever-increasing tensions between China and the United States, as Chinese power increasingly challenging the United States as the world's sole superpower.
“This century will be marked by the US-China relationship,” says Niklas Granholm, research director at the Total Defense Institute, FOI.
“There is a shift in power and means of influence in the international system. In relative terms, China's power is growing while US power is shrinking. It is the conflicts that may arise around this division of power that will become the most important. We can talk about the position of China in relation to Taiwan, China in relation to Japan, relations with North Korea. A lot of things can matter there,” adds Niklas Granholm.
Niklas Svanström also believes that the relationship between China and the United States is the most dangerous in the long run.
“The only variant of World War III that can be imagined obviously involves China and the US. I can’t say that this worries me, in my opinion, indirect conflicts may arise, that is, the war will be waged in a third country,” says Niklas Svanström.
India - Pakistan
States: India, Pakistan, USA, China, Russia.
The disputed northern province of Kashmir is in practice divided between India and Pakistan. There have been several wars between countries for the right to this area, and new conflicts are constantly breaking out.
After 18 Indian soldiers were killed in a terrorist attack on a military base in September 2016, India's Home Minister tweeted:
"Pakistan is a terrorist state that should be named and isolated."
Pakistan vehemently denied any involvement in the incident.
“Relations between India and Pakistan are always turbulent. Right now, it doesn’t look like there will be a strong escalation, but there is nothing to indicate any big moves towards their rapprochement in the future, ”says Isak Svensson.
Both countries are nuclear powers, and each supposedly has more than 100 nuclear warheads.
"It's easy to imagine an unintentional escalation to a full-fledged nuclear war that no one wants but can be triggered by terrorism," Matthew Bunn, a nuclear weapons analyst at Harvard's Belfer Center, told the Huffington Post.
India has a policy of not being the first to use nuclear weapons. Instead, an attempt was made to increase the ability to respond to provocations by rapidly sending armored columns deep into Pakistani territory.
Militarily weaker Pakistan responded by introducing Nasr short-range missiles that can be equipped with nuclear warheads.
Many experts fear that a development where Pakistan feels compelled to use tactical nuclear weapons to defend itself could quickly turn a small conflict into a full-blown nuclear war.
Niklas Svanström, however, believes that the likelihood of a world war is low.
“Other countries do not have interests related to security policy there. Pakistan has close relations with China, while India has close relations with Russia. But neither Russia nor China will take risks and start a large-scale military confrontation. It is also hard for me to imagine that the US would interfere in such a conflict.”
India - China
Indian Army General Bipin Rawat said in early September that the country should prepare for a two-front war against Pakistan and China.
Shortly before this, a ten-week confrontation between China and India over the definition of the border ended in the Himalayas. Chinese road builders escorted by the military were stopped by Indian troops. The Chinese claimed to be in China, the Indians claimed to be in Bhutan, an ally of India.
According to Bipin Rawat, similar situation could easily escalate into conflict, and Pakistan could then take advantage of this situation to its advantage.
“We must be prepared. In the context of our situation, war is very real,” Rawat said, according to the Press Trust of India.
The border between China and India has long been a point of contention, but the atmosphere is now quite relaxed. But while China and Pakistan have moved closer economically, aggressive nationalism suggests that this may be changing.
“It is difficult to see any hints as to why a conflict could break out there, but there is an increased risk of this. The economies of both countries are growing rapidly, and both countries are spurred on by rather aggressive nationalism. The unresolved territorial issue is, of course, a clear risk factor,” says Isak Svensson.
Niklas Svanström does not think that China will gain much from this conflict, and that India simply cannot win a war against China. Conflicts will continue, but on a limited scale.
“The only situation that can lead to a full-scale war is if India recognizes Tibet as an independent country and starts supporting the Tibetan military movement that is fighting against China. I regard this as something extremely unlikely,” says Niklas Svanström.
the Baltics
States: Russia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, NATO military alliance.
One of the biggest risks that could now lead to conflict is Russia's growing ambitions against Europe, says Niklas Granholm, head of scientific work at the Total Defense Institute, FOI.
“Russia has abandoned the set of rules that has been in place since the early 1990s and which defines European security measures,” says Niklas Granholm. - The main milestone in this matter was the war against Ukraine, when in 2014 there was an invasion of this country and the annexation of Crimea, which marked the beginning of the conflict in eastern Ukraine. Russia has shown great faith in military means. The Baltic region has again found itself on the line of confrontation between East and West, which seemed to many quite improbable just a few years ago.”
The cause of the conflict may be ethnic Russian minorities in the Baltic countries, says Isak Svensson.
“In Ukraine, Russia has shown that it is ready to use military force in order, from its point of view, to protect Russian-speaking minorities. Thus, there is a hidden risk of Russian intervention in the Baltics if an internal crisis breaks out in any of the countries. Such a scenario is quite conceivable. It is rather unlikely today, but possible in the future.”
Subscribe to us
World wars, in which many states and a huge number of people are involved, still excite the minds of civilians to this day. The political mood is becoming more and more tense, and now and then there are different kind conflicts between countries. Of course, people are not left with the idea that the beginning of the Third World War is just around the corner. And such worries are not groundless. History shows us many examples when a war started because of one, at first glance, a small conflict, or through the fault of a state that wanted to get more power. Let's get acquainted with the opinion of experts, as well as on this issue.
It is quite difficult to understand the political actions of various countries today, as well as to understand the overall picture of the interaction of foreign states.
Many of them are economic and trade partners and are closely interconnected. Other states are in constant opposition to each other. In order to at least a little comprehend the situation in the world today, it is necessary to turn to the opinion of experts in this matter.
If you ask experts the question of whether there will be a Third World War, then you can hardly wait for a definite answer. There are many opinions. However, the world's leading experts have quite a lot of common ground in their vision of the situation today. Almost all of them believe that the situation is now extremely tense. The constant military conflicts of countries, the long-term division of spheres of influence, the desire of subjects for political and economic independence, as well as the very precarious financial condition of many states undermine the general peace. In addition, news of popular discontent and even the revolutionary mood of people has been appearing more and more recently. This is also a negative factor in the issue of World War III.
Experts say that such a mass confrontation on this moment is not beneficial to any of the countries. However, the behavior of individual states still alarms experts. America is a prime example.
Today, the question of whether there will be a Third World War is increasingly disturbing the minds of representatives of power structures. And there are quite understandable reasons for that. Recently, the most economically developed state has already been mentioned several times in the context when it came to military conflicts in other countries. There is an opinion that the United States has assumed the role of a sponsor of many wars. Of course, in this case, the country is interested in the end result, which should be beneficial to America. But this state should not be considered exclusively in the role of an aggressor. In fact, the relationship between countries is much more complex than they appear to civilians. And no one can with full confidence place positive and negative accents on political map peace. With all this, the fact of economic and political interference by America has been recorded more than once. And far from always, this participation of the country in the conflicts of other states was approved.
As for the very influence of the United States and its authority, in fact, this country does not have such an enviable position in terms of financial stability. The country is too large to be able to talk about the complete economic independence of America. Therefore, any provocation by the United States can be stopped at the initiative of its trading partners. In particular, we are talking about China.
To date, the whole world is following the development of the situation in Europe. We are talking about the Ukrainian conflict that broke out not so long ago. And immediately, many citizens had a very urgent question about whether the Third World War could break out soon. In a matter of weeks, Ukraine has turned from a peaceful state into a real training ground for civil confrontation. Perhaps the predictions are already coming true, the Third World War is already beginning?
To bring at least some clarity, it is necessary to consider the causes of the conflict that arose between the citizens of one country, which, in turn, led to serious unrest around the world. Ukraine was invited to join the European Union. However, the conditions at the same time for the country were offered very uncomfortable, if not worse. The borders would remain closed. And practice shows that the initial introduction of a single currency (the euro) immediately leads to a massive rise in prices for all goods in the country.
Many experts support the opinion that Ukraine in such a case would find itself in the European Union solely as a source of cheap work force. However, not all citizens were in solidarity with this opinion. The conflict flared up due to the fact that a large number of people did not support the President in his decision to refuse to join the European Union. Citizens believed that this was a real betrayal of Ukraine and a loss of huge opportunities in the future. The confrontation acquired mass character, and soon armed character.
So, will there be a third world war because of unrest in Ukraine? After all, many countries were involved in the conflict. Russia, as a longtime ally and partner of Ukraine, as well as a state located in close proximity to this country, took an active part in attempts to resolve the confrontation peacefully. However, these actions were perceived by many states in Europe and the United States as illegal. At the same time, there is a huge number of Russian citizens on the territory of Ukraine, who in any case must be protected. In general, we have a massive conflict that has already reached the global level. And if one of the countries decides to defend its interests through military actions, armed confrontation, alas, cannot be avoided.
If we consider the world relations of states as a whole in recent years, we can note a fairly large number of "weak" places. It is they who can ultimately lead to much more serious consequences. The third world war can get an impetus for its development even in the form of a small confrontation between citizens of one or more states. To date, the main harbingers are considered, according to leading experts in the field of politics, an extremely tense situation in Ukraine, possible sanctions against the Russian Federation from Europe and America, as well as dissatisfaction with other fairly large powers that have nuclear weapons and imposing military power. Such drastic negative changes in relations between countries cannot but have a negative impact on trade and world markets. As a result, the economy and currency will suffer. Traditional trade routes will be undermined. As a result - the weakening of some countries and the strengthening of the positions of others. Such inequality most often becomes the reason for equalizing positions at the expense of war.
The third world war, the year of the beginning of which, according to experts, may already be close, at one time was mentioned in the prophecies of various clairvoyants. A striking example is the world-famous Vanga. Scientists have found that her predictions regarding the world's future come true with an accuracy of 80%. However, the rest, most likely, simply could not be correctly deciphered. After all, all her prophecies are quite blurry and consist of veiled images. At the same time, the main high-profile events of the 20th and 21st centuries are clearly traced in them.
To verify the veracity of the words of this amazing woman, you need to read her predictions several times. The third world war is mentioned in them quite often. She spoke about the "fall of Syria", the confrontation of Muslims in Europe, as well as mass bloodshed. However, there is hope for a positive outcome. Vanga in her predictions mentioned a special "Teaching of the White Brotherhood" that would come from Russia. From that moment on, the world, according to her, will begin to recover.
Not only Vanga spoke about the upcoming bloody confrontations between countries. There are no less accurate. He also quite clearly saw in his time a lot of events of our time that have already happened. Therefore, many scientists and experts attach great importance to the prophecies of Nostradamus.
And again the dreamer speaks in his quatrains about aggression on the part of the Muslims. According to him, chaos will begin in the West (you can take it as Europe). The rulers will take to flight. It is possible that we are talking about an armed invasion Eastern countries to the territory of Europe. Nostradamus spoke of the Third World War as an inevitable phenomenon. And many believe his words.
Prophecies about the Third World War can be found in the records of many clairvoyants. Mohammed predicted the real Apocalypse. According to him, the Third World War will certainly embrace modern humanity. Mohammed called the clear signs of a bloody battle the spread of human vices, ignorance, lack of knowledge, the free use of drugs and "intoxicating the mind" drinks, murder, breaking family ties. As can be seen from modern society, all these harbingers are already there. The widespread spread of human cruelty, indifference, greed will invariably, according to the prophet, lead to another large-scale war.
There are several opinions on this matter. Someone is sure that the greatest danger is China because of the colossal number of citizens, military forces, as well as the incredible patriotism that has survived to this day. Many experts draw a completely understandable analogy of this country with the USSR. In both cases, powerful
In connection with recent events in the world, the United States has also begun to act as an aggressor. Since this state constantly intervenes in all world conflicts, and also regularly uses weapons to resolve certain issues, America is considered to be one of the main threats.
Countries where Islam is practiced are considered no less dangerous. Muslims have always been quite a conflict people. It is from there that bloody terrorist attacks in developed countries and suicide bombers originate. It is possible that the prophecies about the Third World War, based on the massive invasion of Muslims in the states of Europe, may well come true.
Today the weapon went out on new level. There were nuclear bombs. People are destroying each other with increasing zeal. If the Third World War breaks out in the near future, then its consequences will be truly catastrophic. Most likely, one or more will use their advantage and deliver the killing blows. In this case, an incredible number of civilians will die. The earth will be polluted with radiation. Humanity is waiting for degradation and inevitable destruction.
As you can see from history, many wars began with small conflicts. There was also a revolutionary mood of the civilian population of the countries, mass dissatisfaction of people with the situation that had arisen, economic global upheavals. Today, the relationship between countries is very closely linked with many complex factors. Relying on bad experience past generations, the following conclusion can be drawn. Under no circumstances should radical political movements be allowed to spread. As Nostradamus said, the Third World War would turn out to be the very Apocalypse that people have been waiting for throughout almost their entire history. Therefore, all countries need to carefully control all movements based on hatred, the superiority of one nation over others. Otherwise, there is a risk of repeating the mistakes of the past.
Many experts say there is a very real chance of preventing another war. To do this, it is necessary to stabilize the economic condition of the most financially unstable states, to localize internal conflicts in countries and prevent outside interference. In addition, tremendous efforts will be required in order to eliminate the main cause of confrontations in modern world- racial hatred.
An increasing number of professionals are Special attention Russia against the backdrop of the current difficult situation in the world. Russia is one of the largest exporters natural resources, has a serious political and economic influence on other countries. It is quite logical that many states are afraid of the Russian Federation and see it as a potential threat. However, the Russian government does not carry out any political provocations. Most likely, the country has to be on the defensive for the most part and protect its own interests. The third world war, the prophecies of which often mention Russia as one of the main participants in the conflict, may well begin in the Russian Federation itself. Therefore, the government of the country must carefully weigh each of its decisions and actions. It is quite possible that the strengthening of the state will cause a negative reaction from Europe and America, which will lead to war.
Will there be a third world war? Perhaps, none of the current rulers can give a specific answer to this question today. After all, the situation changes every day. It is extremely difficult to predict anything. A huge role in this matter is played by accurate and timely decisions taken by the heads of various states. In particular, we are talking about the countries of Europe, America, China, Russia. It is they, according to experts, who occupy the leading positions when it comes to the risk of military confrontation. Nostradamus spoke of the Third World War as an armed conflict between several countries of East and West. If we interpret these words in a modern way, it turns out that just one careless action on the part of the head of a large state - and bloodshed cannot be avoided.
In our turbulent times, when every day there are loud statements the mighty of the world about the buildup of military potential, tensions with neighboring countries, when crises, terrorist attacks, local conflicts have already become practically the norm, people ask themselves the question: Will there be a full scale third world war?
Now truth is mixed with fiction, good with evil, science with metaphysics. This has led even skeptical atheists to listen, though not always openly, to various prophecies.
Here we would like to structure the existing predictions, opinions, forecasts on the topic of the third world war. And then invite readers to draw their own conclusions.
Millionaire, unspoken sponsor of the "color revolutions", a man with the cunning and mind of the devil himself, George Soros, who, thanks to his intuition, made a fortune on speculation on the stock exchanges, reported the inevitability of revenge between East and West.
He is referring to China, along with "its secret and open ally - Russia" and Japan and South Korea - allies of the United States, as well as all NATO countries.
"Then the world will be on the verge of a new, nuclear war" .
Moreover, he is sure that China will win. Therefore, at the World Bank meeting, he recommended "make concessions to the Chinese government", "to allow the yuan to be made the world's currency."
By the way, the head office of the Rothschild family foundation (which has long had a reputation as a creditor of various obscure schemes, people in different countries, enterprises) for the first time was actually moved to another part of the world - namely from New York to Hong Kong. Together with him, the gold and foreign exchange reserves and documents also moved. Is this not an indirect indication of the future winner?
The question of whether a nuclear war is worth asking those people (living or long dead) who have already proven correct predictions in other things. For example, Alois Irlmeier.
He made them in 1953, in the era of the decline of the destroyed Germany. And how surprised his contemporaries were with his stories about the homeland that had become rich and attractive to emigrants. As well as "it will be very warm in the world" - allusion to global warming? "People from the Balkans, Africa and the East" will come to Germany are current migrants.
He also reported on the popular German currency, which will depreciate sharply.
After “the Bear and the yellow Dragon will invade to fight the Eagle from the west. The explosion will destroy Prague. After that, the rulers will finally sit down at the negotiating table.”
Aloisa Irlmeier
It is curious that the destruction of Prague by the “climate gun”, which at that time (1980s) even no one knew about, was also mentioned by another clairvoyant - American Veronica Luken.
She spoke about the war between the US and Russia (and this was in the era of disarmament, the idea of brotherhood, the Nobel Peace Prize to Gorbachev and other hopes for peaceful coexistence.
Luken urged her not to believe it.
After the end of World War 3, people will give up technology and permitting weapons and “begin to live a spiritual life, working with a plow on the ground.”
Veronica Luken
It is quite possible that after the nuclear winter there will be no other way out...
The earliest prophet with reliable predictions, who lived at the beginning of the 16th century, Ursula Shipton, who predicted the plague, the attack of the Spaniards on England, said this about the 21st century:
Yellow people will attack with the power of the bear. All because of the envy of the northern countries. The war will go from east to west. Few will survive.
This article may seem intimidating. But we all live in such a time that the beginning new war global scale is becoming a real prospect. In the article we will answer the question of whether the date of the beginning of the Third World War is predicted or not.
In the view of most people who grew up on filmography based on the Great Patriotic War, the standard of fighting looks like a clipping from a movie. Reasoning logically, we understand that exactly how ridiculous a saber from 1917 in the hands of Soviet soldier 1941, it will be strange to observe a picture of barbed wire being cut at night by partisans in our time.
Yes, and you must admit, having weapons of mass destruction in the form of nuclear charges, bacteriological crops and climate control, it is paradoxical to expect a repetition of the classics in the form of a bayonet-knife and a dugout.
Quiet panic, gradually undermining the Internet users and skillfully fueled by the media, is felt in the thousands of requests received every hour. People are so convinced of the inevitability of trouble that they almost never ask questions - will it happen? Much more relevant is the clumsy wording: when is appointed exact date start of World War III?
And now this is scary.
The era when forests, fields, rivers and the defeated people were the main contribution to the winner has passed irrevocably. Today, the greatness of the country is dictated not by population and not rich history victories, but the possession of underground treasures: oil sources, deposits natural gas, coal seams, uranium deposits.
The date of the beginning of the Third World War is not hushed up. She just passed so long ago that her exact number is hardly preserved in the minds. The dream of the engines of trade policy has come true - the economy and the struggle for first place in the leadership elite have become the main values of life.
Here it is useful to recall the main method of trade relations, which works everywhere and at all times. The most selective piece was never given to those who bargained and fought for it - there was always someone third, standing aside and sympathetically watching the fight.
Many will intervene, one will get it. It is no secret that the main threat to Russia is attributed to the United States, but the events unfolding around the world's largest leaders suggest that the general tension creates only the appearance of a real threat. The flow of information masterfully maintains the highest bar on the scale of mass hysteria, while the war unleashed by a mighty power (read - the United States) began a long time ago.
Events in Ukraine, Iraq, and Syria speak not of spontaneous, but of carefully thought-out actions, on which not a single hundred analysts with a wealth of strategic experience have worked, which simply does not exist in any of these countries. After all, we are not talking about random clashes, reminiscent of the previous yard-to-yard fights - we are talking about a war that draws in the masses. And here all sorts of peacekeeping missions with the introduction of friendly troops at the ready with friendly weapons only fuel the hostile mood.
The EU readily accepts information in the form in which it is presented by the United States - the EU apparently has neither the time nor the initiative to investigate. Like a bull on a red rag, the leaders of the European Union will react to the slightest move by the United States towards military action against Russia.
This will give a reason to talk for a long time to the restraining Chinese government. The stagnation of American troops in the Pacific region has long poisoned the existence of the patient Chinese, whose hand is already tired of trembling over the nuclear button. Israel's reaction is also predictable - a long-awaited consensual nod from the United States will allow them to fall on Tehran, but how long Israel itself will last after that is a big question. The last volleys in Iraq will hardly have time to die down, as Libyan, Omani, Yemeni and (where without them) Egyptian bombs will simply sweep away the unlucky aggressor.
Anyone else interested in the start date of World War III? Then we discuss further.
It is useful to hear what he thinks about the events, it is scary to say - the future, retired Colonel General Anatoly Lopata, ex-boss General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and First Deputy Minister of Defense of Ukraine. Looking ahead, we note that the remark former minister defense about the location of the future battlefield completely coincides with the opinion of British Air Force Colonel Ian Shields.
When asked by journalists what, in fact, the Third World War is and when it will begin, Anatoly Lopata calmly explained that the war is on full swing and the aggressor country is called in it - who would you think? - of course, Russia. And even in relation to America, at least in the fact that it responds with sympathy to the Assad regime in Syria (!). At the same time, the colonel general admits that the United States is forced to reckon with the Russian Federation and this will remain unchanged, due to the huge economic and military potential of the latter.
The date of the start of the Third World War, according to the specialist, thus belongs to the distant past, but its development to the scale of epic battles is in the future, which still needs to be lived up to. Anatoly Lopata even shared a mysterious figure - 50. In his opinion, it is after this number of years that the warring powers will clash in the wide expanses of space.
Joachim Hagopian, who has been known since 2015, warned that the recruitment of "friends" by the US and Russia is not accidental. China and India will follow Russia in any case, and the EU countries have no choice but to accept America's policy. In Korea, Hagopian predicted military neutrality with respect to both powers, but a rather stormy internecine war with the possibility of activating nuclear charges. It can be assumed that the day when the powerful weapon is put into action is the date of the beginning of the Third World War.
Alexander Richard Schiffer, an interesting personality and former head of NATO, in his book: "2017: War with Russia", predicted the defeat of the United States due to financial collapse, followed by the collapse of the American army.
Vladimir Zhirinovsky, as always, is unambiguous and says what the majority is delicately silent about. He is sure that America will not start any open action until all the countries involved in the military conflict gnaw among themselves in collapse, and, exhausted, lay down what remains of their weapons. Then the US will generously gather up the dejected losers and emerge as the sole winner.
Sergei Glazyev, Advisor to the President of the Russian Federation, proposes to create a coalition that fundamentally does not support a military policy against Russia. The set of countries that are officially ready to speak out in favor of renunciation of armed conflict, according to him, will be such that America will simply be forced to moderate its appetites.
The date of the beginning of the Third World War Vanga, the most famous Bulgarian seer, either could not or did not want to predict. In order not to confuse the minds with specifics, the clairvoyant said only that she sees religious strife around the world as the cause of the war. Drawing a parallel with current events, it can be assumed that the date of the start of the Third World War, which Vanga did not predict, falls on the period of terrorist acts of the ISIS group disguised as offended religious feelings.
How not to mention the world-famous American Horatio Villegas, whose vision of fiery spheres hitting the earth from heaven in 2015 became a sensation. Adjusting quite materialistic tasks to the act of clairvoyance, Horatio hastened to announce that he knew the date of the start of the Third World War - 05/13/2017. With regret or great joy, we note that fireballs On May 13, no one had to watch.
It remains to be hoped that people who expected big events in March 2017 were not very upset when they lost confirmation of the words of astrologer Vlad Ross. Recall that this person also named the date of the start of the Third World War - 03/26/2017, which did not find a response in reality.
